Bigotry and judgment are the height of insecurity.
Jasmine Guy
So here's a new entry for these people.
And my final take on their concerns once and for all.
I try my best to make every reader's presence known and acknowledged.
So this entry is specially for you guys.
BEFORE WE MOVE ON, PLEASE BE REMINDED: THIS IS DIFFERENT FROM MY FIRST ISSUE WITH THE DETRACTOR. SO FOR THE BASHERS, TRY HARD TO STICK TO THE TOPIC AND THE CONTEXT. IF YOU CAN'T, THEN TRY HARDER. :)
It is quite amusing that all of a sudden, negative and positive comments have poured like rain on my entry about these Girltalkers.
And what makes me wonder is, those who posted negative comments are all hiding behind the ANONYMOUS I.D.
I have can only think of three reasons why they would use the ID:
1. They're cowards
2. They're close to my detractor/s
3. They are full of insecurity
Let's start.
I did not filter the comments in my controversial entry.
But if there's one entry that made me laugh out loud the most, is the Anonymous ID who bashed me for my NARS POWDER BLUSH IN OUTLAW
PLEASE READ HER REPLY FIRST HERE
Okay, so Ms. Anonymous, here's what I have to say.
Where did you get the whole idea that I was selling expired make- up? I did admit that I was careless when I sent an expired freebie to the buyer because I didn't know, and I don't use freebies. I recycle them with other purchases. The buyer didn't follow up after I sent the package. So how would I resolve the problem? I did my other end, but I wasn't confronted. So what would you have me do? Pray tell me.
Secondly, Yes, I got the Nars Blush for 100 bucks. And I sold it for 400 bucks. Ive explained in my cbox that I was approximating the real value of the product, the time I spent to get it, the gas I've spent to meet the seller etc. But as far as I'm concerned, by far, I have sold it rightly for it's condition and for what it's worth. Because if I'm evil, just like what you're stating, then I would sell it at 800php, or even higher, right?
Okay so given the fact that selling expired make- up is wrong (which is what you're implying in your reply), then might as well blame the seller whom I got it from!
So why did people hoard her products even if the seller admitted that the make- ups have been with her for around 3 years already? It's because her items are dirt cheap. C'mon a 100-peso nars, shu, or cargo blush will not come your way everyday. :)
Let me ask you this: Given the condition of her products, what if she priced all her blushes from 400 and up? Would you react like this?
Of course you will! But if she didn't, you will not.
So judging your reply, it is merely a rant. Darling, I'm sorry if you can't afford the 400php. But I can't sell the item at a giveaway price either. I need money too.
So honey, what made you think that selling expired make- up is justifiable as long as the price is way cheap?
Oh please. Induce me.
AND REGARDING YOUR ISSUE WITH MY BOYFRIEND:
Honey, this is my blog, so if you are offended with every little thing that I'm going to say, then don't visit me. Delete me from your browser or your memory, I don't care. As long as it will serve you right. :)
I tried thinking of any reason but I really don't see the point why you would be offended when I claimed that my boyfriend's rich?
Is it wrong to acknowledge that someone's rich or beautiful, if they really are such?
Here's the difference between acknowledging and bragging:
You acknowledge something just because it is the truth. But bragging, is exaggerating and reiterating the truth.
I just said my boyfriend's rich. And that's the truth. But I didn't post it in the cboxes or blogs of my followers or whoever.
SO, WHAT' YOUR PROBLEM? :)
And to quote blogger Topaz Horizon's words (tweaked them a bit):
UGLY PEOPLE (WOMEN) PUT YOU DOWN, WHILE BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE (WOMEN) LIFT YOU UP.
AND TO QUOTE FROM HER AGAIN (NOT IN VERBATIM):
IF YOU BASH MY STATEMENT, THEN I PROBABLY KNOW WHAT YOU LOOK LIKE.
I think what's more wrong is to claim that you are rich, when in fact you are not.
But if you were really offended, please let me know. :)
Anyway, just in case you're looking for the point of my reply, it's just simple: Your reply is lousy.
And before I leave you behind, here's some brain food for you:
Anger is a manifestation of a deeper issue... and that, for me, is based on insecurity, self-esteem and loneliness.
Naomi Campbell
And Katherine, as far as I'm concerned, you weren't involved in the issue. I appreciate an open mind, but please do not act as if you are one of my detractors.
And to someone who replied why I didn't admit that the detractor already apologized:
Please back read. I have mentioned that she did. For Christ's sake, read closely!
But what would you have me do? Create another entry for that? O c'mon. Please don't tell me what to do.
So what's your problem if I already see the person/s in a different light?
And ask the detractor. I already accepted her apology. But it doesn't mean that things should be back to the way it was. If it's my choice to not talk nor even be civil with this person anymore, then it shouldn't be your frikkin' issue because it is my decision. :)
I have a lot of friends. So losing them is not really a matter of life and death.
Psh. You say forgive and forget?
Just in case you didn't know, SOME THINGS ARE EASIER SAID THAN DONE.
Like you. You say that you are trying to be as professional as possible. But I can very much see whose side you're leaning on.
And before I leave you behind again, here's what I have to say to you:
PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH.
AND TO THE REST OF THE "ANONYMOUS" PEEPS
Dang. You see how hard it is if you don't provide your real name? I can't address you formally!
So I'll just call you "THE PACK" :)
Here's what I have to say, THE PACK.
I will not deal with you guys any longer. Because:
1. You guys are hiding behind the ANONYMOUS I.D. and are trying to revert the whole issue against me.
This is a sign of COWARDICE.
You can't even introduce who you guys are! I'm pretty sure some of you have blogs. Because with the way you guys write, I pretty have an idea of who you guys are. :)
So why not show me who you guys are and face me? :)
I do not deal with immaturity. You can't even stand by your arguments, hence the Anonymous IDs.
LAST BUT NOT THE LEAST:
As far as I'm concerned, here's the point of my issue:
THE PRIVATE MESSAGING INCIDENT IS BELOW THE BELT. IT IS UNJUSTIFIABLE TO ACCUSE SOMEONE AS A SHAM SELLER JUST BECAUSE THEIR INSTINCTS TELLS THEM SO. UNLESS THERE IS PROOF, ASSUMPTIONS WILL ONLY REMAIN ASSUMPTIONS.
Please do not go beyond and out of the context. This is my issue. Unless you prove my issue wrong, then that's the time I'll answer you guys back again.
Your counter arguments shouldn't concern the opening of the thread, explanations in the thread, my transactions, and most especially, my frikkin' life.
And please, think of another thing to attack apart from my professionalism. Gasgas na yan. :)
Because that totally leads to another topic, which is evident in your posts.
It should be in the context of my point in the issue.
And before I leave all of you, here's a quote to enlighten you all:
Some people live closely guarded lives, fearful of encountering someone or something that might shatter their insecure spiritual foundation. This attitude, however, is not the fault of religion but of their own limited understanding. True Dharma leads in exactly the opposite direction. It enables one to integrate all the many diverse experiences of life into a meaningful and coherent whole, thereby banishing fear and insecurity completely.
- Lama Yeshe
THANK YOU SO MUCH! AND TO MY BEAUTIFUL FOLLOWERS, KEEP ON READING! :)
Jasmine Guy
So here's a new entry for these people.
And my final take on their concerns once and for all.
I try my best to make every reader's presence known and acknowledged.
So this entry is specially for you guys.
BEFORE WE MOVE ON, PLEASE BE REMINDED: THIS IS DIFFERENT FROM MY FIRST ISSUE WITH THE DETRACTOR. SO FOR THE BASHERS, TRY HARD TO STICK TO THE TOPIC AND THE CONTEXT. IF YOU CAN'T, THEN TRY HARDER. :)
It is quite amusing that all of a sudden, negative and positive comments have poured like rain on my entry about these Girltalkers.
And what makes me wonder is, those who posted negative comments are all hiding behind the ANONYMOUS I.D.
I have can only think of three reasons why they would use the ID:
1. They're cowards
2. They're close to my detractor/s
3. They are full of insecurity
Let's start.
I did not filter the comments in my controversial entry.
But if there's one entry that made me laugh out loud the most, is the Anonymous ID who bashed me for my NARS POWDER BLUSH IN OUTLAW
PLEASE READ HER REPLY FIRST HERE
Okay, so Ms. Anonymous, here's what I have to say.
Where did you get the whole idea that I was selling expired make- up? I did admit that I was careless when I sent an expired freebie to the buyer because I didn't know, and I don't use freebies. I recycle them with other purchases. The buyer didn't follow up after I sent the package. So how would I resolve the problem? I did my other end, but I wasn't confronted. So what would you have me do? Pray tell me.
Secondly, Yes, I got the Nars Blush for 100 bucks. And I sold it for 400 bucks. Ive explained in my cbox that I was approximating the real value of the product, the time I spent to get it, the gas I've spent to meet the seller etc. But as far as I'm concerned, by far, I have sold it rightly for it's condition and for what it's worth. Because if I'm evil, just like what you're stating, then I would sell it at 800php, or even higher, right?
Okay so given the fact that selling expired make- up is wrong (which is what you're implying in your reply), then might as well blame the seller whom I got it from!
So why did people hoard her products even if the seller admitted that the make- ups have been with her for around 3 years already? It's because her items are dirt cheap. C'mon a 100-peso nars, shu, or cargo blush will not come your way everyday. :)
Let me ask you this: Given the condition of her products, what if she priced all her blushes from 400 and up? Would you react like this?
Of course you will! But if she didn't, you will not.
So judging your reply, it is merely a rant. Darling, I'm sorry if you can't afford the 400php. But I can't sell the item at a giveaway price either. I need money too.
So honey, what made you think that selling expired make- up is justifiable as long as the price is way cheap?
Oh please. Induce me.
AND REGARDING YOUR ISSUE WITH MY BOYFRIEND:
Honey, this is my blog, so if you are offended with every little thing that I'm going to say, then don't visit me. Delete me from your browser or your memory, I don't care. As long as it will serve you right. :)
I tried thinking of any reason but I really don't see the point why you would be offended when I claimed that my boyfriend's rich?
Is it wrong to acknowledge that someone's rich or beautiful, if they really are such?
Here's the difference between acknowledging and bragging:
You acknowledge something just because it is the truth. But bragging, is exaggerating and reiterating the truth.
I just said my boyfriend's rich. And that's the truth. But I didn't post it in the cboxes or blogs of my followers or whoever.
SO, WHAT' YOUR PROBLEM? :)
And to quote blogger Topaz Horizon's words (tweaked them a bit):
UGLY PEOPLE (WOMEN) PUT YOU DOWN, WHILE BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE (WOMEN) LIFT YOU UP.
AND TO QUOTE FROM HER AGAIN (NOT IN VERBATIM):
IF YOU BASH MY STATEMENT, THEN I PROBABLY KNOW WHAT YOU LOOK LIKE.
I think what's more wrong is to claim that you are rich, when in fact you are not.
But if you were really offended, please let me know. :)
Anyway, just in case you're looking for the point of my reply, it's just simple: Your reply is lousy.
And before I leave you behind, here's some brain food for you:
Anger is a manifestation of a deeper issue... and that, for me, is based on insecurity, self-esteem and loneliness.
Naomi Campbell
And Katherine, as far as I'm concerned, you weren't involved in the issue. I appreciate an open mind, but please do not act as if you are one of my detractors.
And to someone who replied why I didn't admit that the detractor already apologized:
Please back read. I have mentioned that she did. For Christ's sake, read closely!
But what would you have me do? Create another entry for that? O c'mon. Please don't tell me what to do.
So what's your problem if I already see the person/s in a different light?
And ask the detractor. I already accepted her apology. But it doesn't mean that things should be back to the way it was. If it's my choice to not talk nor even be civil with this person anymore, then it shouldn't be your frikkin' issue because it is my decision. :)
I have a lot of friends. So losing them is not really a matter of life and death.
Psh. You say forgive and forget?
Just in case you didn't know, SOME THINGS ARE EASIER SAID THAN DONE.
Like you. You say that you are trying to be as professional as possible. But I can very much see whose side you're leaning on.
And before I leave you behind again, here's what I have to say to you:
PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH.
AND TO THE REST OF THE "ANONYMOUS" PEEPS
Dang. You see how hard it is if you don't provide your real name? I can't address you formally!
So I'll just call you "THE PACK" :)
Here's what I have to say, THE PACK.
I will not deal with you guys any longer. Because:
1. You guys are hiding behind the ANONYMOUS I.D. and are trying to revert the whole issue against me.
This is a sign of COWARDICE.
You can't even introduce who you guys are! I'm pretty sure some of you have blogs. Because with the way you guys write, I pretty have an idea of who you guys are. :)
So why not show me who you guys are and face me? :)
I do not deal with immaturity. You can't even stand by your arguments, hence the Anonymous IDs.
LAST BUT NOT THE LEAST:
As far as I'm concerned, here's the point of my issue:
THE PRIVATE MESSAGING INCIDENT IS BELOW THE BELT. IT IS UNJUSTIFIABLE TO ACCUSE SOMEONE AS A SHAM SELLER JUST BECAUSE THEIR INSTINCTS TELLS THEM SO. UNLESS THERE IS PROOF, ASSUMPTIONS WILL ONLY REMAIN ASSUMPTIONS.
Please do not go beyond and out of the context. This is my issue. Unless you prove my issue wrong, then that's the time I'll answer you guys back again.
Your counter arguments shouldn't concern the opening of the thread, explanations in the thread, my transactions, and most especially, my frikkin' life.
And please, think of another thing to attack apart from my professionalism. Gasgas na yan. :)
Because that totally leads to another topic, which is evident in your posts.
It should be in the context of my point in the issue.
And before I leave all of you, here's a quote to enlighten you all:
Some people live closely guarded lives, fearful of encountering someone or something that might shatter their insecure spiritual foundation. This attitude, however, is not the fault of religion but of their own limited understanding. True Dharma leads in exactly the opposite direction. It enables one to integrate all the many diverse experiences of life into a meaningful and coherent whole, thereby banishing fear and insecurity completely.
- Lama Yeshe
THANK YOU SO MUCH! AND TO MY BEAUTIFUL FOLLOWERS, KEEP ON READING! :)
0 comments:
Post a Comment